Page 283 - Proceeding 2015
P. 283

MANOLE Cristina                              FAMP
                               HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND STRATEGIES IN THE LIGHT OF ROMANIAN PUBLIC      CCASP
                                                        ADMINISTRATION


                              In terms of management theory, professional performance appraisal system is an intrinsic and extremely
                              important part of the human resources management (M.R.U.) in particular. According to J.T. Austin and
                              P. Villanova (see fig. no.1), evaluation of performance is a central activity of M.R.U. because it affects
                   PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11 TH  ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
                              numerous decisions of the M.R.U. system (Manolescu, 2001, p. 382; Ferris and Buckley, 1996, p. 272).






















                        30 th  – 31 st  October 2015  ”Strategic Management for Local Communities”   Bucharest









                                  FIGURE 1 - CONNECTIONS OF THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS WITH OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE HUMAN
                                                              RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
                                                   Source: after J.T. Austin, P. Villanova and H. D. Hindman
                              According  to  the  opinion  of  other  specialists  through  more  strategic  approach  to  individual  and

                              organizational performance, its evaluation should be regarded as a central element of the concept of
                              “performance management” (Anderson and Herriot, 1994, p.42). In fact, the essence of the professional
                              performance  evaluation  process  is  that  it  must  concern  every  employee’s  contribution  to  achieving

                              organizational goals. In regards to the Romanian public sector, although the legislature’s intention was
                              that the performance of civil servants to be evaluated in conjunction with and in relation to institutional
                              objectives, this situation was not reflected in institutional practice, mainly as a consequence of training

                              individuals directly involved in the human resources process (both decision-making levels and operational
                              levels), and the lack of tools that provide standardized correlations based on the requirements of the
                              position with skills, abilities aptitudes of potential employees .
                                                                              3

                                 c)  From the perspective of motivation and remuneration of managerial personnel



                              3  The Strategy to Strenghten Public Administration, 2014-2020 (project)


                                                                                                          281
   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288