Page 96 - Proceeding 2015

FAMP URS Nicolae
CCASP SOCIAL NETWORK USE IN ROMANIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: BIG CITIES, SMALL STEPS

Sibiu 3,85%
Gala?i 3,54%
Deva 3,41%
Bucure?ti 3,20%
Sector 2 3,02%
Sector 6 2,73%
Ploie?ti 2,61%
Târgu-Jiu 2,37%
Re?i?a 2,31%
Piatra Neam? 1,78%
Alba Iulia 1,67%
Bra?ov 1,59%
Baia Mare 1,50%
Oradea 1,37%
Ia?i 1,28%
Craiova 1,28%
Sector 3 1,18%
Constan?a 1,00%
Arad 0,96% PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11 TH ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ”Strategic Management for Local Communities” 30 th – 31 st October 2015 Bucharest
Giurgiu 0,95%
Tirgu Mures 0,87%
Cluj-Napoca 0,84%
Târgovi?te 0,78%
Boto?ani 0,75%
Slatina 0,74%
Timi?oara 0,71%
Râmnicu Vâlcea 0,70%
Sfântu Gheorghe 0,66%
Sector 4 0,64%
Alexandria 0,51%
Bacău 0,31%
Sector 1 0,29%
Tulcea 0,19%

FIGURE 5 – EMPLOYEES IN ICT (%)
Source: The Author

The results varied from municipality to municipality, with the winner appearing to be Sibiu (the ICT

department has, on paper, 17 staff). The problem is that, after talking with the head of this department,

94