Page 145 - Proceeding 2015
P. 145

CONSTANTIN Daniela-Luminita, GOSCHIN Zizi and ILEANU Bogdan     FAMP
                             THE ECONOMIC REGENERATION OF LAGGING REGIONS. AN INQUIRY INTO THE REGIONAL
                              OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME CONTRIBUTION, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE ENTERPRISE      CCASP
                                           SUPPORT IN THE NORTH-EAST REGION OF ROMANIA


                              Besides the above comments, it can be added that in the case of enterprise support significant difficulties
                              are noticed with regard to co-financing capacity: they come from the need to ensure the own contribution
                              in relation to the eligible expenses, which, in the SMEs case, can reach 30%. The contribution is much
                   PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11 TH  ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
                              higher if the ineligible expenses are considered as well.

                              As regards the administrative capacity, it is considered good and very good in general terms. The efforts
                              paid in this respect from the very pre-accession period and systematically continued afterwards with the

                              strong support and monitoring of the European Commission  have shown the fruits in stable structures
                              and responsibilities, clear allocation of tasks, good human resource management systems, effective

                              support for project applications, well defined process of payment claims, effective first level controlling,
                              etc.


                              CONCLUDING REMARKS


                              Considering the regional development realities in Romania, the allocations under the ROP have offered
                        30 th  – 31 st  October 2015  ”Strategic Management for Local Communities”   Bucharest   and also ranks third among the lagging behind regions of the EU, it received the highest allocation, namely
                              priority to the lagging regions. As the North-East region is the least developed Romanian NUTS 2 region



                              16.32% of the ERDF for ROP.

                              To date (30 April, 2016), the ROP has an  absorption rate of 73.20%, compared to the average for all

                              operational programmes in Romania that is around 75% (Ministry of European Funds, 2016). The North-
                              East region is above this average, with around 90%. The number of projects in Suceava county represents
                              around 20 per cent of the total number of projects implemented or ongoing in the North-East region, which

                              is a share above the average, considering that the North-East region counts six counties.

                              The institutions involved in the ROP management and implementation display a high degree of staff
                              stability, resulting in the continuity of the corresponding systems. There has been a series of training

                              sessions, consolidating the administrative performance in terms of human resources. The weaknesses
                              indicated  by  the  respondents  to  interview  questions  relate  mainly  to  internal  procedures,  financial
                              constraints,  domestic  legislation  and  politics,  etc.  The  most  frequent  drawbacks  mentioned  by  the

                              interviewees  in  the  North-East  region  refer  to  bureaucracy,  lack  of  transparency,  insufficient
                              communication between institutions, the long waiting time for evaluation results, political intrusion, difficult

                              access to co-financing credits especially because of high interest rates, delays in pre-financing payments,
                              delays in reimbursements, etc. In particular, for Suceava county the need to expand coordination and
                              cooperation between the public  institutions and the private environment, NGOs, civil society has been

                              emphasized, as well as the need of improve interaction between the county council and local public



                                                                                                          143
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150