Page 43 - Proceeding 2015
P. 43

POPESCU Luminiţa Gabriela                        FAMP
                                       PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA AND RESPONSIVENESS GOVERNANCE                 CCASP



                               It is already a known fact that in the last decade’s citizen’s trust in these institutions is in a dramatic
                              decline. This deep lack of trust shown by citizens is an expression of their refusal to accept public policies
                              formulated behind closed doors, a practice where decisions are made without consulting the public.
                   PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11 TH  ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
                              From the perspective of focusing on Romania case, the study brought to attention the existence of major
                              and  dramatic  discrepancies  between  the  preferences  of  citizens  and  governmental  parliamentary
                              agendas. Hence, the premises of building a policy agenda as a result of convergent agendas are being

                              undermined; responsiveness government is also compromise.  Moreover, the public space where public
                              policy works can not be defined. In such circumstance, it was expected that, including, Romanian citizen’s

                              trust in government and parliament to register a negative grow.

                              REFERENCES


                              Anderson, J.E. (2003).Public Policy making, 5thed. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
                              Ansoff, I., McDonneell,E. (1990).Implanting Strategic Management,Prentice Hall, New York.
                        30 th  – 31 st  October 2015  ”Strategic Management for Local Communities”   Bucharest   Dahl, A.R.(1972). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press.
                              Beck U. (2004). ”O multitudine de probleme locale care au o cauza globala”, Revista Lettre Internationale,
                                  no. 49-50, pp. 46-47.



                              Dahl, A.R. (2002). Democratia si criticii ei(Democracy and her critics), Ia?i: Institutul European Iasi.
                              Jones B.D., Baumgartner, F.R. (2005). The Politics of Attention, Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.

                              Majone, G. (2008).”Agenda setting” in Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford University Press, pp.228-
                                 260.
                              National Council Against Discrimination (2010). Fenomenul discriminării în România-percep?ii ?i atitudini.
                                  Retrieved  June  29,  2015  from:  http://www.cncd.org.ro/files/file/Fenomenul%20discriminarii%20
                                  2009.pdf

                              Public Policy Institute (2011). Monitoring Report about parliamentary activities, Bucharest. Retrieved June
                                 29, 2015 from: http://www.ipp.ro/

                              Teece, J.D.(2009). Dynamic, Capabilities and Strategic Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press
                              Vigoda,  E.  (2000).  ”Are  you  being  served?  The  responsiveness  of  public  administration  to  citizen’s
                                 demand: an empirical examination in Israel”,Public Administration, vol. 78, no.1, pp.165-191.
                              Wildavschy, A. (1975). Budgeting:A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes, Boston: Little, Brown.
















                                                                                                           41
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48