Page 33 - Proceeding 2015

POPESCU Luminiţa Gabriela FAMP
PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA AND RESPONSIVENESS GOVERNANCE CCASP

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11 TH ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

30 th – 31 st October 2015 ”Strategic Management for Local Communities” Bucharest Way of interviewing: face to face interviews at the respondents house, or by telephone, using the same

FIGURE1.PUBLIBLIC AGENDA IN VAROIUS FIELDS
Suorce: National Council for Combating Discrimination, 2010.

questionnaire. The questions remained the same despite the interviewing manner.

Representative volume: 1154 people, + 18 years old.

Representative type: probabilistic group, stratified, multi-staged one. Dual frame of representation:
houses with telephones connected to the main market telephone operator (representative in 761 houses)
and the adult population of Romania (400 representative houses selected through the random method).

Both representations have been projected according to the territorial distribution of the Romanian adult
population. The assignment of the representative sample was proportional to the group size.

Stratification criteria: 8 historical regions and the urbanism degree (8 different types of regions).

Units of selection: In the representative case of the face to face interviews, the primary units of selection
were the regions. The selection of the houses in this case was made through the random method, and
people were selected through the “last birthday” method. In the case of the representation sample for the

telephone interview, the primary unit of selection was the house itself, and people were also selected
through the “last birthday” method.

31