Page 124 - Proceeding 2015
P. 124

FAMP                                      NICOLAE Ciprian
                CCASP      QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RISKS IDENTIFIED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NON-
                                        REIMBURSABLE FUNDS IN ROMANIA IN 2007-2013


        For example, some of the risk in the risk registers were so general that could never be quantified: “failure

        to achieve financial engineering activity due to limited access to the levers of allocating funds”.
                                                                                                    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11 TH  ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
        The fourth finding of the analysis is that the most identified risks are related to: Financial & Accountancy
        (99 risks), Financing management (44), Human resources (43), Funds absorption (35), Reimbursement

        activities (32), Implementation capacity (20), Irregularities (22), Single Management Information System
        - SMIS (20).

        At  the  end  of  risks  redefining  process,  the  distribution  was  the  following:  Funds  absorption  (6),
        Implementation capacity (7), Financial & Accountancy (5), Financing management (8), Irregularities (9),

        Human resources (7), Reimbursement activities (17), Single Management Information System - SMIS (6).

        As seen in the below figure, the redefining of risks comprised a serious number reduction for Financial &
        Accountancy related risks (from 99 to 5), Financing management related risks (from 44 to 8), Human

        resources related risks (from 43 to 7) and Funds absorption related risks (from 35 to 6). We can conclude
                                                                                                         30 th  – 31 st  October 2015  ”Strategic Management for Local Communities”   Bucharest
        that in these areas, possible in the specific departments of the authorities/institutions there is a poorer

        understanding of risks than in the other areas / departments.


                120
                                       99
                100

                 80
                 60                             44             43
                        35
                 40                                                    32
                              20                       22
                                                                                6
                 20
                  0      6        7      5       8      9        7      17      20










                                       Initial risks  Redefined risks

                            FIGURE 1 - ORGANIZATION OF RISKS ON MAIN ACTIVITIES/AREAS
                                           Source: The Author


        A  big  question  mark  we  can  put  on  the  procurement  related  risks.  Only  11  risks  identified  by  all

        authorities/institutions might seem very little if we take into consideration the fact that the most financial



           122
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129